There will always be a J. Evans Pritchard trying to force the arts to yield to statistical analysis.
If you’ve been listening, you have heard the conversation. Data, Data. Data.
Standardized tests are the treasure troves of statistics that are driving–oh, excuse me, informing— instruction. # 2 lead pencils are the wands that, with the right sleight of hand, can make you see anything a skilled statistician wants you to imagine you saw.
But like poetry, teaching is an art, a fine art. Just as it is obvious intellectual farce to reduce the mystery of poetry to the “data driven analysis” spoofed in the clip, the same could be–no, should be— said for the purely statistical analysis of the instructional artistry that happens in classrooms every day.
Armies of academics going forth to evaluate kids and teachers via mathematical calculations, cold hard data? Pardon?
Don’t misunderstand; testing has a place in education. It is one of many tools good teachers use to plan and adjust their instruction. Reliable and valid testing can provide benchmarks of achievement. Sound tests can show teachers where kids need more time on task.
But great teachers know that testing–particularly one-size- fits-all testing– provides only part of the masterpiece that is learning. Learning is about curiosity and confidence. It’s about taking academic risks. It is about the intangibles that make every parent’s child a priority.
Every child who crosses the threshold into our classrooms is a unique and complex individual.They come to us with strengths and challenges, enthusiasm and fears. No child should ever become a statistic on a bar graph, a mere blip of data on a spreadsheet. Kids are people, not commodities.
Like poetry,the art of instruction defies scientific deconstruction. There is just too much happening in classrooms on a day-to-day basis to reduce teaching to a few days of testing, especially flawed testing, especially testing created by one of the biggest text book publishers in the country.
Obviously, you say.
But here’s the rub. Politicians use data mined from classrooms nationwide to further their own ambitions, to promote their personal bureaucratic promises.
Just as J. Evans Pritchard’s method of deconstructing poetry ultimately destroys the beauty of the text, data driven education crushes the joy of learning, stifles creativity on both sides of the desk. Teachers, fearful of the way test scores now compute into annual performance reviews, are far more likely to play it safe. Meeting Pearson’s benchmarks of proficiency has become a matter of professional survival. Kids, too, will stay within the lines because everyone knows standardized tests have no patience for divergent thinkers.
Where’s the data on the data?
P.S. : And big thanks to all who continue to follow me on all my sites.